#CookvTait principle has created problems for Apple and has created advantages for non-US persons and corporations

Introduction …

The U.S. tax system is premised on the assumption that it can levy taxes on economic activity in other nations. This simple premise applies to both corporations and to individuals.

In the case of individuals: The taxation of economic activity in other nations takes place at the time that the money is earned.

In the case of corporations: The taxation of the economic activity, the taxation takes place when the money is returned to America.

In any case, the United States discriminates very strongly and punitively against all things American. The views of Apple CEO Tim Cook has some interesting comments on this issue.

Apple CEO Tim Cook testifies before the Levin Committee in 2013 – explains how the US tax system hurts US business https://t.co/mgrIATnJhQ

— U.S. Citizen Abroad (@USCitizenAbroad) December 24, 2015

Apple CEO Tim Cook interviewed on 60 Minutes 2015 …

”This is a tax code, Charlie, that was made for the industrial age, not the digital age,” he said. “It’s backwards. It’s awful for America. It should have been fixed many years ago. It’s past time to get it done.”

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Washington likely to keep close watch on tax loophole as Burger King seeks to become Canadian

Washington likely to keep close watch on tax loophole as Burger King seeks to become Canadian http://t.co/1reN8vNcni via @financialpost

— U.S. Citizen Abroad (@USCitizenAbroad) August 27, 2014

Once again President Obama demonstrates his contempt for the law by noting that if he doesn’t like the results of the law, he has no respect for the law.

And on the Levin front:

Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown urged people to boycott Burger King over its move to relocate to Canada and eat at rival Wendy’s or White Castle instead. Meanwhile, Senator Carl Levin said he believes Burger King risks a backlash from its customers that would outweigh any tax benefit.

Of course, the U.S. could simply amend it’s tax laws to make them compatible with the rest of the world (that is if there is world outside the U.S.)