This is a brilliant article – one of the best I have seen on Canada’s proposed changes to the citizenship act. The article includes:
CF&P President Andrew Quinlan commented, “The costs of FATCA’s misguided fiscal imperialism are mounting. It is past time for elected officials to wake up to the unmitigated disaster that they have unleashed upon the world.”
It has been reported that the Republican National Committee has passed a resolution at its winter meeting on January 24, 2014 that called for the repeal of FATCA, a law that the Wall Street Journal referred to as “aimed at U.S. tax evaders.” The IRS has been active in publicizing the coming enforcement of this controversial law which was tacked on to 2010 legislation passed to increase employment in the United States. The controversial FATCA amendment, which has nothing to do with employment, may represent an invasion of privacy and is accredited with causing an increase in EXPATS loosing banking privileges in their home countries and even with causing the recent increase in renouncing their citizenship. That number has grown from 742 in 2009 to more than 1,854 last year, according to State Department figures. It is also said to
The Republican party adopted a resolution to repeal the Foreign…
View original post 437 more words
Canada has every right and obligation to protect our borders and know who we admit into the country. In order to do that, we are implementing an electronic travel advisory program with our other trading partners. That program should be extended to Mexico as a replacement for entry visas.
There has been at least one denied Freedom of Info request to get the real numbers, and there is a new one out for which we are waiting to receive the results. The real issue at hand is what are the REAL numbers.
The above graph shows the officially released statistics for renunciations of US citizenship over the period 2006 to 2013.
The blue line takes statistics from the Federal Register, the red line is from the FBI list publicized in order to list renunciants who are not allowed to purchase firearms.
There are serious deficiencies in the data.
First, the data states only those that have actively renounced their citizenship, paid $450, and made oral statements to the local US embassy as to their renouncements. Those figures do not include those who have “relinquished” their citizenship, by having stated that they have performed a relinquishing act such as working in a federal government, military, or most often those who had taken upon a 2nd citizenship some years ago when such an act automatically cancelled US citizenship (duals were not allowed)>
However, none of it matches anecdotal evidence of those who have been going…
View original post 156 more words
@cselley Well done! Cuts to the heart of the matter. How can @PMHarper take a person’s citizenship that he never gave to begin with?
Taxes are not the only obligations of U.S. citizens abroad. Don’t forget about the “Selective Service” – AKA “The Draft”
Men between ages 18 and 25 by law must apply for the Selective Service to retain benefits such as “student financial aid, loans, or grants; vocational training under WIA; government employment; and security clearances” (sss.gov) and to avoid penalties such as “…a fine of up to $250,000, imprisonment for up to five years, or both.” (sss.gov)
SSS.gov explicitly states:
Dual nationals of the U.S. and another country are required to register, regardless of where they live, because they are U.S. nationals.
See also Aliens and Dual Nationals – Liability for Service
I was asked if I had registered with the Selective Service System, and if I had my card with me when I applied for a US passport…
View original post 47 more words