Monthly Archives: July 2012

Thanks again – your posts should be spread far and wide!

International Liberty

Politicians exaggerate as a routine matter and have well-deserved reputations for stretching the truth. But when they repeatedly make assertions that they (or their aides) know to be false, they surely deserve to be criticized. That is the purpose of my new video. Entitled “President Obama’s Dishonest Demagoguery on So-Called Tax Havens,” the four-minute presentation looks at the two sound bites that the President uses to demonize low-tax jurisdictions.

View original post


Thanks for this incredible post and videos. Americans who still believe in “Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness” need you and the CATO institute!

International Liberty

Earlier this year, I defended Mitt Romney and Bain Capital from the absurd accusation that they did something wrong by utilizing low-tax jurisdictions.

So-called tax havens, as I’ve explained on many occasions, play a valuable role in the world economy. Indeed, they should be emulated rather than persecuted.

In a follow-up post, I mocked ABC News for a ridiculous non-story as they tried to make Romney appear guilty for following good business practices.

The issue has become hot again, so I talked about Romney and tax havens with Jason Riley at the Wall Street Journal.

Since nobody has claimed that Romney violated U.S. tax law, this kerfuffle only exists because the left wants to create the impression that tax havens are bad and then tar the GOP’s presumptive nominee with guilt by association.

Brian Garst of the Center for Freedom and Prosperity nails the issue in his column…

View original post 276 more words

Opinion: What’s U.S. Citizenship Worth? William McGurn

Video streaming by Ustream

This is an incredibly interesting video. The video was made in association with an article that Mr. McGurn wrote in April 2012 titled – “What’s U.S. Citizenship Worth?” Mr. McGurn certainly clarifies that many people are NOT renouncing U.S. citizenship to avoid taxes. He emphasizes the complexity, the reporting requirements and the simple fact that people outside the United States do not want to be associated with U.S. citizens. Interestingly he introduces analogy of the Berlin Wall. Months and months ago I wrote that with FATCA, the U.S. was creating it’s own Berlin Wall.

The United States is in serious trouble. It must:

Stop citizenship-based taxation and repeal FATCA.

What is U.S. citizenship worth? It depends where you are coming from. But, for long term residents abroad, the value of U.S. citizenship is far less than the problems associated with keeping it!

As Form Nation becomes a police state, there is an increasing number of laws and a decreasing requirement to prove wrongful intent

The purpose of this post is to make three important points.

1. The U.S. has so many laws that it is impossible to know whether you are in compliance with the law

2. It takes less and less (in terms of guilty intent and knowledge) to be convicted of the crime of violating one of these laws.

3. The combined effect of  “1” and “2” is that the U.S. has the highest rate of incarceration in the world.

I will discuss each point separately. Continue reading

Incredible unfairness in the US tax code – IRC: Confusing capital gains with income edition

Unfairness to the general public:

There are those who believe that Mitt Romney has a number of “carried interests’ and takes advantage of the unfairness because:

Unfair to U.S. citizens abroad:

On the other hand, if  you are a poor U.S. citizen abroad you will be destroyed by the unfairness of your non-U.S. mutual fund being subject to the PFIC provisions because:

I guess the U.S. tax code is simply unfair!

But, why is it unfair? What is going on here? In March of 2012, Fareed Zakaria, did an interesting analysis on CNN called:

America needs a two page tax code. I highly recommend it.

Mr. Zakaria notes that:

We’re going to hear a lot of polarized rhetoric over the next few months. The Republicans and Democrats will seem to disagree about everything. But there is one huge and important area where there is a possibility – a possibility – of bipartisan action and that’s tax reform.

Most Americans – Republicans and Democrats – dislike the tax code. They’re right to do so. America has what is arguably the world’s most complex tax code. The federal code plus IRS rulings is now 70,000 pages long. The code itself is 16,000 pages. The statist French, for example, have a tax code of only 1,909 pages – only 12% as long as ours. And then there are countries like Russia, the Czech Republic, Estonia that have innovated and moved to a flat tax, with considerable success.

You have to understand, complexity equals corruption.

When John McCain was still a raging reformer, he used to point out that the tax code was the foundation for the corruption of American politics. Special interests pay politicians vast amounts of cash for their campaigns and in return they get favorable exemptions, credits or loopholes in the tax code.

In other countries this sort of bribery takes place underneath bridges and with cash in brown envelopes. In America it is institutionalized and legal but it is the same thing: Cash to politicians in return for favorable treatment from the government.

The U.S. tax system is not simply corrupt, it is corrupt in a deceptive manner that has degraded the entire system of American government. Congress is able to funnel vast sums of money in perpetuity to its favored funders through the tax code without anyone realizing it.

The examples given in this post are examples of extreme unfairness. How an it be that an “carried interest”, taxed as a capital gain? How an it be that investing in a Franklin Templeton mutual fund in Canada is taxed in such a punative way when to invest in the same fund in the U.S is not?

It is obvious that the difference in tax treatment is unrelated to the differences in the substance in the investment. The treatment is clearly the result of other considerations.

I suspect that the perverse tax treatement – the “PFICization” of foreign mutual funds is the result of lobbying from the U.S. mutual fund industry (and to apply this to U.S. citizens living outside the U.S. is absurd). What about the “carried interest” issue? Could lobbying be a factor here?

In the mean time, I highly recommend Fareed  Zakaria’s commentary on the U.S. tax code.