I have been inspired by Mr. Ward. Here is the letter (with many factual modifications to protect the young person in question) that I wrote on the occasion of that young person’s High School graduation. Continue reading →
Payable by U.S. persons on the sale of a principal residence
“The principal residence exemption provides Canadian taxpayers with a generous tax break, possibly one we take for granted. In other countries the gain on the sale of a residence is not always completely free of tax. In the United States, for example, only the first $250,000 is exempted. For Canadian tax purposes, there is no monetary limit on the size of the capital gain that can be excluded from your income.”
It may come as a surprise to U.S. persons (Green Card holders, citizens or those who spend too much in the U.S.) that capital gains from the sale of a principal residence are taxable. The general principle is described here. The principle is that one gets a $250,000 exemption from capital gains tax. But, as always make sure that you read the rules carefully.
This is one more example of how citizenship-based taxation harms U.S. persons who live outside the U.S. For example, in Canada, the sale of a principal residence is a “tax free capital gain”. Not so in the U.S. What does this mean practically? A lot. Continue reading →
China will cut taxes on the profits that foreign companies take out of the country by up to 50 per cent after rules on withholding taxes were relaxed to encourage more overseas investment.
The move will also apply to dividends paid by Chinese listed companies to foreign shareholders through the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor scheme . In both cases, the lower tax rates will apply only to companies and shareholders based in countries, such as the UK, that have double taxation agreements with China.
The changes could save companies billions of dollars worth of tax payments, which might initially lead them to repatriate more profits, but ultimately should provide incentives for more investments, according to experts at KPMG. US companies, however, cannot benefit as they are taxed on a global basis by US authorities. Continue reading →
American exceptionalism is the idea that the United States is different from other countries in that it has a specific world mission to spread liberty and democracy. In this view, America’s exceptionalism stems from its emergence from a revolution, becoming “the first new nation,” and developing a uniquely American ideology, based on liberty, egalitarianism, individualism and populism. This observation can be traced to Alexis de Tocqueville, the first writer to describe the United States as “exceptional” in 1831 and 1840. Historian Gordon Wood has argued, “Our beliefs in liberty, equality, constitutionalism, and the well-being of ordinary people came out of the Revolutionary era. So too did our idea that we Americans are a special people with a special destiny to lead the world toward liberty and democracy.”
The specific term “American exceptionalism” was first used in Russian 1929 by Soviet leader Joseph Stalin chastising members of the Lovestone-led faction of the American Communist Party for their heretical belief that America was independent of the Marxist laws of history “thanks to its natural resources, industrial capacity, and absence of rigid class distinctions.” American Communists then started using the English translation in factional fights.
Although the term does not necessarily imply superiority, many neoconservative and American conservative writers have promoted its use in that sense. To them, the United States is like the biblical “shining city on a hill,” and exempt from historical forces that have affected other countries.
Note the focus on spreading liberty and democracy. If democracy implies a duty on the part of politicians to listen to voters, then it is clear that the “spreading liberty and democracy” does NOT include spreading it to U.S. citizens abroad. On the issue of “liberty”, U.S. citizens abroad are “Form Slaves” who live in constant fear of committing “Form Crime“. On the issue of democracy well: Continue reading →
"One thing I don’t mention in the video is that a flat tax is “territorial,” meaning that only income earned in the United States is taxed. This common-sense rule is the good-fences-make-good-neighbors approach. If income is earned by an American in, say, Canada, then the Canadian government gets to decide how it’s taxed. And if income is earned by a Canadian in America, then the U.S. government gets a slice."
Tax regulations is one of the most confused and complex topic when you are in US on non-immigrant visa (H1/F1/L1, etc.) or you are permanent resident (Greencard holder) or US Citizen.
I found this nice information in form of slides on slideshare.net by Sanket Shah of NSGlobal. It is really nice information and worth going through once to brush up your knowledge on tax basics and implications.